Faith and Justice – Landscape after a Battle

The Experience of Jesuits in Eastern Europe

Adam Żak SJ

 

1. The faith-justice relationship in the Christian experience under Communism

 

After the great debates that took place in the Church and in the Society in the post Council decades, there is a common understanding that social commitment and the Social Apostolate cover the same area of meaning. When one talks of the social commitment of Christian believers and –a fortiori– of religious, it is taken for granted that this concept is a synonym for the Social Apostolate. Furthermore, it seems commonly accepted that the term Apostolate be qualified also by the adjective ‘social’. It is generally understood that there is an intrinsic link between the Social Apostolate and social justice, so much so that the latter is increasingly considered to be clearly one of the aims of the Social Apostolate. At the same time however, at least from a linguistic perspective, ‘social commitment’ and the ‘social apostolate,’ because of their clear association with the term ‘social justice,’ although not opposed to the concept of caritas, do not explicitly refer back to this concept to qualify as Christian. That is, they are not seen as distinctly different from explicitly non-Christian visions of social commitment. In fact, the concept of the Social Apostolate as it has developed over recent decades has been strongly influenced by reflection on the relationship between the declaration of faith and commitment to justice. The point of departure for this reflection is not an abstract analysis, but actual experience of social injustice experienced by many peoples within Christian tradition, especially in Latin America a phenomenon that posed a challenge to the declaration of faith in the contemporary world.

     While in the historical experience of Chris­tians in Latin America, and then in theological reflection, the link between faith and justice has been experienced and pondered upon with great naturalness, believers in Eastern Europe governed by Communists suffered, under the standards of justice, a fierce attack on their faith which had no precedent. It must be understood that behind the attack on faith there was a radically negative judgement on religion, especially Catholic Christianity, as a formidable reactionary force opposed to progress and social justice. For Christians in Communist countries the whole range of meanings linked to the problematic of social justice and expressed in language was negatively occupied by Marxist propaganda.

     Thus Christians in Eastern Europe were not able to understand the ease with which their brothers and sisters in faith used Marxist conceptual instruments to analyse reality; nor could they conceive the role of faith in the realisation of social justice projects inspired by Communist ideology. This ideology has in fact monopolised every discussion on social justice, progress and development. The introduction of dictatorship as a form of government was ideologically justified by the struggle for social justice. This traumatic experience has strongly conditioned the way in which the discussion of the relationship between faith and justice has been received. Christians even avoided the phrase “social justice,” preferring to use other terms, for example, social love, human rights, the subjectivity of individuals and peoples and so on. Furthermore, isolation over several decades and total control by the state prevented Christians in Eastern Europe from contributing directly in a significant way to the animated debate on these issues taking place in the free world.

     This was the reason that Church documents refuting Marxist prejudices against the Christian faith as reac­tionary and opposed to progress were welcomed and studied with special attention. I should mention some in particular which inspired a clear echo. First of all, we note the documents from the time of the Second Vatican Council, including the encyclical by John XXIII Pacem in terris (1963), the declaration on religious freedom Dignitatis humanae (1965) and the conciliary constitution Gaudium et spes (1965). These documents, together with the encyclical Populorum progressio (1967) and the Apostolic letter Octogesima adveniens (1971) by Paul VI, offered Christians in Eastern Europe the means to understand their church experience, which in turn helped them to live their faith proudly and defend it. The very attempt to impose atheism through­out Central and Eastern European society was perceived as a great injustice inasmuch as it was a systematic violation of the rights of believers. In this way, the defence of faith and its proclamation spontaneously became a struggle for justice. What was at first a struggle for the rights of the Church became, under the influence of the Council and growing sensitivity about human rights in civil society, a struggle for human and social rights. Defence of the faith, and the mere fact of continuing to profess and proclaim it, became the most significant contri­bution to the re-establishment of conditions of elementary justice.

     If we consider this general context, we will understand more easily the difficulties experienced by Jesuits in Eastern Europe, largely excluded as they were from the intense debates of the seventies, in finding their own position with regard to Decree 4 of GC 32. This does not mean that there was opposition to the decree. Rather, there was a widespread feeling that the decree, and with it GC 32, was not “for us”. Eastern European Jesuits who followed GC 32 to some extent found their bearings more easily in the documents of the two General Synods in 1971 and 1974 dedicated to justice and evangelisation, and, above all, in the two Vatican documents of 1984 and 1986 on liberation theology aimed not at them but at Latin America. Only after the political changes in 1989/90 was there a partial return and participation in the search for identity within the Social Apostolate, and this was thanks to their involvement in the debate which led to the Congress of Naples in 1997 and the drawing up of the document Characteristics of the Social Apostolate in the Society in 1998.

     Immediately after the fall of Communism reflection began on issues centred on the relationship between faith and justice within the EOR (1) Provincials Conference. The following are some examples of the issues studied. The 1990 meeting was dedicated to the issue – Faith and Justice: The challenges facing Jesuits in Eastern Europe (cfr. Promotio Iustitiae 48, 1991). In February 1992 there was rich discussion on the issue Our apostolic priorities in the light of Decree 4. At the 1997 meeting, the social dimension of every Jesuit Apostolate was examined in depth in the context of the prevailing tendency in the Assistancy to reduce the Apostolate to cura animarum.

     Since 1995 EOR provincials have actively promoted meetings within the Social Apostolate of the Assistancy and have nominated a coordinator in this sector, Father Robin Schweiger (SVN). Since 1996 there have been regular study meetings at which Jesuits interested, or engaged, in the Social Apostolate may exchange experiences. The Social Apostolate sector is the only one coordinated in a continuous way at Assistancy level. This indicates that the Society in Eastern Europe is really making an effort to face the challenges of the process of unprecedented transformation.

 

2. Understanding the kairos of the fall of Communism

 

     If, on the one hand, it is true that for reasons of censorship a wide philosophical-theological debate on the faith-justice relationship was lost during the decades of the Communist state, it is equally true that this relationship was experienced as a conjunction that frequently culminated in martyrdom.

     In our part of Europe the words of John Paul II in his apostolic letter Tertio Millennio Adveniente, where he says that in the twentieth century the martyrs returned, have a special significance. This testimony must not be forgotten; in fact their witness should not be lost to the Church but must bear fruit. Martyrs sow the seeds of belief. Here it is not a question of remembering martyrdom as a sort of exhibition of suffering undergone to elicit compassion, but to make the experience of martyrdom fruitful, discovering how the work of grace in history restores justice in a surprising way.

     Theologically speaking, the martyrdom of innumerable believers in both Eastern and Western traditions is the most important contri­bution to the declaration of faith which produces the fruits of justice. In almost the entire region the Christian faith progressively became an immeasurable source of strength for an ever more conscious resistance to injustice. With time this resistance, nourished by the Word of God and prayer, contributed to the collapse of Communism. Thus, many saw the fall of Communism as a liberating event, God’s response to the cry of his people.

     If we seek points of reference by which to interpret the fall of Communism theologically, we find them in the history of Israel, in the liberation from slavery in Egypt. The Roman Catholic liturgy of the Easter vigil with readings on the Israelites crossing the Red Sea (Exodus 14, 15-30, and the subsequent canticle 15, 1-7. 17-18) becomes – at least in the Latin Church – a point of reference whereby all recent history can be lived and interpreted as the history of salvation. This interpretative elaboration on the basis of the liturgy is extremely important insofar as life under dictatorship was marked and scarred by the experience of evil in many ways. It seemed –and here was the force of temptation against faith– that evil was going to win. The experience of the evil suffered continues to exert its force and must be countered by the experience of grace. Communism has gone, yet the temptation to imagine the victory of evil amidst the confusion of the present is still with us. Victory over evil, experienced historically and interpreted theologically in terms of the liberation coming from God, is essential to reinforce hope. A return to the experience of martyrdom is important in discovering the work of grace in history.

     Faced with Communism, Christianity accomplished its role by drawing from its own source, that which animates it and constitutes its essence – the victory of Christ over evil. This means that the force of Christianity is far more than merely the negation of an imposed ideology bolstered by arguments from some cultural current of thought or some anti-Communist political movement. The original force of the Christian faith is manifested in the force of its martyrs. Through this force, Christianity inspired hope, reinforced awareness of the dignity of man and human rights, confuted the absolute character of Communist ideology with arguments and even ensured the sense of a community of values unifying the continent of Europe. Going farther, Christianity has been the voice of those who were deprived of elementary rights, the force of martyrs and confessors.

     Christianity has defended freedom and justice, even the freedom to pardon enemies, repudiate revenge and give up one’s own life for others. It is in this sense that freedom operated long before the prisoners were able to leave the Gulag archipelago. It did this inside that archipelago, as witnessed in that extraordinary novel by Solzhenitsyn, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich.

     In presenting this reflection, I find it necessary to underline something else I consider very important, not to be forgotten as one looks at the numerous difficulties experienced by Christians in Eastern Europe after the fall of Communism. Freedom does not automatically make anyone happy. For many, freedom can be an empty word because, instead of work, it provides a passport, making rooted people beggars and vagabonds in the world. There is no doubt that, in resisting the totalitarian pretensions of Communism, the main force was not the negation of injustice, but the profession of a faith which liberates. Now the temptation for many is to think that our most important task is to run down everything that makes life insecure, or which disappoints in a functioning democracy and market economy. Not even Jesuits are free of this temptation. Thus, even now, under new conditions, the experience gained under Communism that faith, far from being negative or reactionary, is a salvific, hope-inspiring force, retains all its validity. This experience remains a permanent challenge to thinkers and artists, theologians and pastors, for ecclesiastic and religious communities, journals and faculties. The martyrdom of our brothers and sisters in faith places us as believers before a fundamental requirement – to reveal the Christian faith as a positive force that saves instead of condemning, which is not a voice of misfortune but of hope, and which helps us read the work of grace in the course of history. This is the context of the Society’s task in countries recently emerged from Communism.

     How can the Society respond to this challenge under the conditions of post-Communist society – pluralist, democratic, relativist and so on? One of the responses made by Jesuits offer is the Social Apostolate.

 

3. Perspectives for the Social Apostolate in Eastern Europe

 

     As already mentioned, the Social Apostolate was introduced into the agenda of the EOR Conference of Provincials immediately after the political changes. Numerous Jesuits from all EOR provinces took part in the groups for reflection and exchange promoted by the Provincials over the course of the years, contributing not only to the development of the Social Apostolate, but also to overcoming a certain diffidence arising from the long separation between developments in the East and West. I would like to develop my reflection around some questions.

 

What is the common experience now of Jesuits in post-Communist countries?

 

     Towards the end of the nineties, during a meeting of EOR Provincials, it was noted quite openly that we are no longer united by the past experience of Communism; the suffering of the past is no longer a common denominator. In the process of concentrating on the past under Communist rule, an opening towards the future has emerged. We have discovered that the problems faced by our mission in post-Communist countries grow increasingly similar to those the Society is experiencing in other parts of the world. Long before 2005 when the Conference of Provincials of ECE and EOR decided to unite in one single conference, we found in joint working meetings that we were discussing the same problems relating to secularisation, formation and such issues. The realisation came that Jesuits in the West and in the East are in the same boat and called upon to face very similar problems. Even at the time of GC 34 no delegate from either of the two Assistancies could have imagined a development of this nature. The horizons seemed so different that a possible coming together was considered only in the very long term.

     While this realisation is certainly valid for Jesuits, we cannot say that the same process was so rapid in other segments of our societies and churches as to produce a similar perception of sailing in the same boat. For this reason one of the greatest tasks of Jesuits in EOR provinces is to help churches and numerous social groups to abandon their victim mentality and discover and face challenges with hope, not fatalism. From the Christian viewpoint, history, despite its apparently inexplicable turns, is always the history of salvation. Even the period of Communism which caused so much suffering belongs to God’s design. The fall of Communism itself may be seen from an unforced theological reading in Paschal terms as a liberation event, a gift to be accepted and made to bear fruit for the future. This reading puts an end to negative brooding over the past in a fatalist vision of the present and the future, and opens up the possibility of grace operating in history, the prospect of hope and the future prepared by God, the Lord of history. The Jesuit in the post-Communist world is a serene and grateful witness to a liberating God!

 

What is the main task of the Jesuit Social Apostolate in post-Communist countries?

 

     Before going on to attempt a response, I would like to focus on the distinction between the social dimension of each Apostolic sector and the Social Apostolate which is devoted to works of a social nature. The social sector in the provinces of post-Communist Europe does indeed exist and assumes different forms in each country but is, understandably, still a somewhat weak sector. The social dimension of the various Apostolates is obviously capable of growth; and for this reason Jesuits working both in the social sector and other Apostolic sectors must realise that ultimately there is a task which unifies all sectors and clearly qualifies the social dimension.

     Apart from those participating in a seminar or undergoing the Spiritual Exercises, what is the crucial need of people attending a Jesuit school or receiving the sacraments in post-Communist countries? What can we, or what must we, as the Society of Jesus, impart to the people?

     It is my deepest conviction, strengthened by every journey made to countries where Jesuits live and work, that the most urgent need in post-Communist countries and the most genuine task of our Apostolate is reconciliation. In fact our greatest problems arise from the fact that we live in the midst of tragic and profound conflicts and divisions between individuals, social groups, religious faiths and nations. These conflicts and divisions are part of the social heritage of each region. Communism decreed the end of these and repressed them but did not resolve them. On the contrary, it created new ones. An obvious example of this state of affairs was the war following the dissolution of Yugoslavia. There are, however, other examples which manifest the same need for reconciliation and I will recount one. I was in Romania on the day the country joined NATO and was witness to a spontaneous comment from a Romanian bishop, obviously happy about the political event being celebrated in the country as a feast day. “This is a very important day,” said the Bishop, “if not for any other, at least for one reason – from now on war with Hungary seems less likely.”

     If, on the one hand, this comment reveals the scars present in this part of Europe, it indicates, on the other hand, a deep need to go beyond the important political significance of the fact that war has become now highly improbable. Now the scars must be healed. The free market will not do this, nor will the joint efforts of the armed forces. We need to work for reconciliation. This is an inherently religious task, with a Christological foundation which we do not need to expound here. It is a task for all those who define themselves “servants of the mission of Christ,” independently of whether they propose a seminar on democracy to young people in a social centre, or accompany the faithful in search of peace with God, themselves and others, or whether they are preaching, confessing or collaborating in a project to resettle war refugees.

     For decades society in our countries was exposed to a dialectic according to which struggle was the engine of progress in history. As a result people have been quick to define and indicate the enemies to be fought. We must be just as quick to work on reconciliation, with social dialogue initiatives and the creation of meeting spaces and opportunities for dialogue with enemies. Reconciliation not only heals scars, but also builds foundations for a different future.

     The work of reconciliation must be measured evangelically, but with care since the heritage is complex. There are not only issues of enmity, nationalism and the consequences of economic and technological backwardness, but also a passivity that expects too much from public and state institutions. At the same time there is a diffidence that inhibits active participation in civil society towards organising something constructive. Certainly, there are many differences between the different countries owing to their different historical experiences. Tendentiously however, the number of those who have been incapable of, or unaware of how to react constructively to the changes is quite high in all post-Communist societies. Thus the gap grows between these “passive” and disappointed masses and the cultural, political and economic elites who make huge profits out of the situation in a selfish way by accumulating wealth and power. Populism also profits from this gap and instead of releasing energies creatively, actually perpetuates injustice. Unfortunately, there are forms of populism justified by pseudo-demagogic arguments drawing on religion, national myth or an idealising of the Communist past. This rather simplified image reveals however the importance of teaching, associations and other forms of social education in the construction of bridges and overcoming of divisions. The work of reconciliation needs multiple concrete initiatives to give visibility and stability to the hope for justice.

     We are not alone in serving faith that does justice. Fortunately the Social Apostolate works in many forms. We are called above all to collaborate, learning from those we want to help. The Social Apostolate of the Society is small compared to the needs and the challenges faced. We need to forgo every form of presumption in order to sow the seeds of hope among the people.

 

Original Italian

Translation by Judy Reeves

 

Adam Żak SJ

Curia Generalizia Gesuita

C.P. 6139

00195 Roma-Prati

ITALY


 

1) The Assistancy of Eastern Europe (EOR) is made up of one independent region, Russia (RUS) and 7 provinces. Though Lithuania and Hungary do not formally belong to the Assistancy of EOR, they share the same history and experience and hence should be considered when we think about the Society of Jesus in Eastern Europe. During the decades under communism, the Region of Russia was in fact non-existent, though there were Jesuits in the Soviet Union and a clandestine formation. Jesuits in the provinces of Bohemia, Slovakia and Romania (like in the provinces of Lithuania-Leetonia, and Hungary) were forced to live in clandestine circumstances and to migrate. The province of Romania has re-emerged only in 1990 with only 7 or 8 members! Only four provinces, Poland Major (PMA), Poland South (PME), Croatia (CRO), and Slovenia (SVN), even with great apostolic limitations were able to continue having some visibility.